The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
21-2369•Kenneth D. Liggins v. Zion Baptist Church
21-2369Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 9, 2023
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-2369
KENNETH D. LIGGINS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ZION BAPTIST CHURCH; PASTOR KARLYLE HILL; DEACON STEVE
WASHINGTON; DEACON OTIS HARPER, SR.; CURTIS LIGGINS, Deacon in
Training; NICOL HILL; DEACON JOSEPH TANSIMORE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at
Harrisonburg. Thomas T. Cullen, District Judge. (5:21-cv-00058-TTC)
Submitted: February 7, 2023 Decided: February 9, 2023
Before WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and MOTZ, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kenneth D. Liggins, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Kenneth D. Liggins appeals the district court’s orders granting Defendants’ motion
to dismiss his civil complaint under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6), denying his motions for entry
of default, and denying his motion for sanctions. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the pending motions and affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. See Liggins v. Zion Baptist Church, No. 5:21-cv-00058-TTC
(W.D. Va. Nov. 24, 2021; Dec. 6, 2021). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.