Paul Okanes v. Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication Sc, d/b/a S.W.I.F.T., Inc.

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-2437
PAUL OKANES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SOCIETY FOR WORLDWIDE INTERBANK FINANCIAL
TELECOMMUNICATION SC, d/b/a S.W.I.F.T., Inc.,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, Senior District Judge. (1:21-cv-00285-LO-TCB)
Submitted: October 18, 2022 Decided: October 20, 2022
Before WYNN and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Paul Okanes, Appellant Pro Se. Genevieve Claire Bradley, McLean, Virginia, Sean
Michael Gibbons, ROTH JACKSON GIBBONS CONDLIN, PLC, Richmond, Virginia,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Paul Okanes appeals the district court’s order denying his pro se Fed. R. Civ.
P. 59(e) motion to reconsider the district court’s order dismissing with prejudice his civil
action filed pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.
§§ 2000e to 2000e-17, denying his counseled Rule 59(e) motion, and denying leave to file
a second amended complaint; and denying his alternative request for leave to file a third
amended complaint.* We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Okanes v. Soc’y for Worldwide Interbank
Fin. Telecomm. SC, No. 1:21-cv-00285-LO-TCB (E.D. Va. filed Dec. 1, 2021 & entered
Dec. 3, 2021). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
* Okanes has not appealed from the district court’s orders dismissing his action or
denying his first counseled Rule 59(e) motion.

-- 2 of 2 --