The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
21-6085•Kevin Herriott v. Lieutenant Jackson
21-6085Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 3, 2021
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-6085
KEVIN HERRIOTT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
LIEUTENANT JACKSON,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Greenville. David C. Norton, District Judge. (6:20-cv-03365-DCN)
Submitted: April 27, 2021 Decided: May 3, 2021
Before KEENAN, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kevin Herriott, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Kevin Herriott appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of
the magistrate judge and dismissing Herriott’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915A(b). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Herriott v. Jackson, No. 6:20-cv-03365-
DCN (D.S.C. Dec. 16, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.