The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
21-6140•United States of America v. Xavier Maurice Sullivan, Jr.
21-6140Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 27, 2021
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-6140
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
XAVIER MAURICE SULLIVAN, JR.,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Greenville. Donald C. Coggins, Jr., District Judge. (6:18-cr-00923-DCC-1)
Submitted: August 24, 2021 Decided: August 27, 2021
Before NIEMEYER and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Xavier Maurice Sullivan, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Sloan Price Ellis, Assistant United States
Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, South Carolina,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Xavier Maurice Sullivan, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his motion
for compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A). Upon review of the record,
we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion. See
United States v. Kibble, 992 F.3d 326, 329 (4th Cir. 2021) (stating standard of review).
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Sullivan, No. 6:18-cr-
00923-DCC-1 (D.S.C. Jan. 7, 2021). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.