The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
21-6143•United States of America v. Antoine De-Marr Washington
21-6143Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 16, 2021
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-6143
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ANTOINE DE-MARR WASHINGTON,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
Richard D. Bennett, Senior District Judge. (1:14-cr-00389-RDB-1)
Submitted: November 19, 2021 Decided: December 16, 2021
Before DIAZ and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Antoine De-Marr Washington, Appellant Pro Se. Jason Daniel Medinger, Assistant United
States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Antoine De-Marr Washington appeals the district court’s order denying his motion
for compassionate release. We have reviewed the record and conclude that the district
court did not abuse its discretion in denying Washington’s motion because it adequately
considered the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors. See United States v. High, 997 F.3d 181, 186
(4th Cir. 2021). Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.