The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
21-6216•United States of America v. James Thomas Webb
21-6216Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 21, 2022
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-6216
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JAMES THOMAS WEBB,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:12-cr-00301-D-1)
Submitted: May 31, 2022 Decided: July 21, 2022
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, THACKER, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James Thomas Webb, Appellant Pro Se. David A. Bragdon, Assistant United States
Attorney, Lucy Partain Brown, Assistant United States Attorneys, OFFICE OF THE
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
James Thomas Webb appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for
compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A) and his motion for consolidated
proceedings. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm the district court’s order. See United States v. Webb, No. 5:12-cr-00301-D-1
(E.D.N.C. Jan. 13, 2021). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.