The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
21-6244•Eric Samuel v. J. CROOM HUNTER, Staff Attorney of the South Carolina Attorney General’s Office
21-6244Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 23, 2021
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-6244
ERIC SAMUEL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
J. CROOM HUNTER, Staff Attorney of the South Carolina Attorney General’s
Office; STEPHANIE P. MCDONALD, Chief Administrative Judge of the Ninth
Judicial Circuit; DANIEL E. SHEAROUSE, Clerk of Court of the South Carolina
Supreme Court; R. MARKLEY DENNIS, Ninth Judicial Circuit Court Judge,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Aiken.
Timothy M. Cain, District Judge. (1:20-cv-01277-TMC)
Submitted: July 20, 2021 Decided: July 23, 2021
Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Eric Samuel, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Eric Samuel appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the
magistrate judge and dismissing Samuel’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint pursuant to 28
U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B), 1915A. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Samuel v. Hunter,
No. 1:20-cv-01277-TMC (D.S.C. Feb. 2, 2021). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.