The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
21-6313•Alfred Bradley Adkins v. CHRISTOPHER GOMEZ, Warden
21-6313Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 27, 2021
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-6313
ALFRED BRADLEY ADKINS,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
CHRISTOPHER GOMEZ, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at
Martinsburg. Gina M. Groh, Chief District Judge. (3:19-cv-00112-GMG)
Submitted: August 24, 2021 Decided: August 27, 2021
Before NIEMEYER and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Alfred Bradley Adkins, Appellant Pro Se. Erin K. Reisenweber, Assistant United States
Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Martinsburg, West
Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Alfred Bradley Adkins, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order adopting
the magistrate judge’s recommendation to grant Respondent’s dispositive motion and deny
relief on Adkins’ 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Adkins
v. Gomez, No. 3:19-cv-00112-GMG (N.D.W. Va. Feb. 4, 2021). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.