The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
21-6334•United States of America v. Michael Gene Terrelonge
21-6334Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 20, 2021
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-6334
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
MICHAEL GENE TERRELONGE,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at
Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., District Judge. (3:09-cr-00229-RJC-1)
Submitted: September 14, 2021 Decided: September 20, 2021
Before THACKER and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael Gene Terrelonge, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Michael Gene Terrelonge appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for
compassionate release pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A), as amended by the First Step
Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-391, § 603(b)(1), 132 Stat. 5194, 5239. Upon review, we
conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Terrelonge’s motion as
amended and supplemented. See United States v. Kibble, 992 F.3d 326, 329 (4th Cir. 2021)
(per curiam) (providing standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s
order. United States v. Terrelonge, No. 3:09-cr-00229-RJC-1 (W.D.N.C. Jan. 15, 2021).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.