The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
21-6411•Jack Zimmerman v. Terry Kilpatrick; Dr. Patrick Craft
21-6411Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 26, 2022
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-6411
JACK ZIMMERMAN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
TERRY KILPATRICK; DR. PATRICK CRAFT,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
JUSTIN ANDREWS; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:18-ct-03167-D)
Submitted: April 14, 2022 Decided: April 26, 2022
Before WILKINSON and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jack Zimmerman, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Jack Zimmerman appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice
Zimmerman’s action filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal
Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971) and the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C.
§ 1346, 2671-80. We have reviewed the record and Zimmerman’s claims and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Zimmerman v. Kilpatrick, No. 5:18-ct-03167-D (E.D.N.C. Sept. 30, 2019 & Feb. 10, 2021).
We grant Zimmerman’s motion to file an addendum/attachment to his informal brief and
deny his motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.