The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
21-6416•United States of America v. Christopher Jermaine Taylor, a/k/a Phoenix, a/k/a C-Murda.
21-6416Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 27, 2021
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-6416
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
CHRISTOPHER JERMAINE TAYLOR, a/k/a Phoenix, a/k/a C-Murda.
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at
Huntington. Robert C. Chambers, District Judge. (3:15-cr-00009-1)
Submitted: August 24, 2021 Decided: August 27, 2021
Before NIEMEYER and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Christopher Jermaine Taylor, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Christopher Jermaine Taylor appeals the district court’s order denying Taylor’s 18
U.S.C. § 3583(e)(2) motion to modify the terms of his supervised release. After reviewing
the record, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying
Taylor’s motion. See United States v. Trimble, 969 F.3d 853, 856 (8th Cir. 2020) (stating
standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.