The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
21-6429•Gregory Green v. TRAVIS M. HYMAN, Assistant Solicitor, Horry County
21-6429Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 27, 2021
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-6429
GREGORY GREEN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
TRAVIS M. HYMAN, Assistant Solicitor, Horry County; JIMMY A. RICHARDSON,
II, Solicitor, Horry County; BRYAN STERLING, Director, South Carolina Department
of Corrections; ALFREDO MORTELL, Warden, Manning Correctional Institution,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence.
R. Bryan Harwell, Chief District Judge. (4:20-cv-03100-RBH-PJG)
Submitted: August 24, 2021 Decided: August 27, 2021
Before NIEMEYER and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gregory Green, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Gregory Green appeals the district court’s order granting in part and denying in part
his Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b) motion for reconsideration of the court’s prior order adopting the
recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing Green’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims
against some of the defendants. Limiting our review of the record to the issues raised in
Green’s informal brief, we find no reversible error. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b); see also
Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important
document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that
brief.”). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.