The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
21-6437•Jeffrey Corporal v. Acting Assistant Warden Butler
21-6437Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 9, 2024
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-6437
JEFFREY CORPORAL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ACTING ASSISTANT WARDEN BUTLER; LT. JAMES SMITH; CCMS CORY
M. WALKER; CCMSII JOSEPH R. JEFCOAT; CCMSII RODNEY L. DAVIS;
COMMISSIONER O. WAYNE HILL; SECRETARY ROBERT GREEN,
Defendants - Appellees,
v.
THE OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL,
Party-in-Interest.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Deborah K. Chasanow, Senior District Judge. (8:20-cv-01809-DKC)
Submitted: November 9, 2023 Decided: February 8, 2024
Before GREGORY and BENJAMIN, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
-- 1 of 3 --
2
Jeffrey Corporal, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
Jeffrey Corporal appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ motion for
summary judgment and denying relief on Corporal’s amended 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the
district court’s order. Corporal v. Butler, No. 8:20-cv-01809-DKC (D. Md. Mar. 2, 2021).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.