The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
21-6509•United States of America v. Kipper Ken King
21-6509Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 29, 2021
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-6509
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
KIPPER KEN KING,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Spartanburg. Bruce H. Hendricks, District Judge. (7:17-cr-00112-BHH-1)
Submitted: June 24, 2021 Decided: June 29, 2021
Before KING and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kipper Ken King, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Kipper Ken King, a federal prisoner, appeals from the district court’s order denying
his motion for compassionate release pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A), as amended
by the First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-391, § 603(b)(1), 132 Stat. 5194, 5239.
Upon review of the record, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion
in denying King’s motion. See United States v. High, 997 F.3d 181, 185 (4th Cir. 2021).
Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.