The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
21-6517•Dmitry Pronin v. Sheriff J. Al Cannon, Jr.
21-6517Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 5, 2022
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-6517
DMITRY PRONIN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SHERIFF J. AL CANNON, JR.; M. MARSILLO; T. M. EVANS; THEODOLPH
JACOBS; SHAUNESSY; LATTIMORE; J. KATHIE BOWEN; GERALD
MATTHEW AUERBACH; TERRY JACKSON; MAZATTI,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Orangeburg. David C. Norton, District Judge. (5:19-cv-00594-DCN)
Submitted: December 17, 2021 Decided: January 5, 2022
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, MOTZ, Circuit Judge, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dmitry Pronin, Appellant Pro Se. Elloree Ann Ganes, HOOD LAW FIRM, Charleston,
South Carolina; Stephen Lynwood Brown, Russell Grainger Hines, CLEMENT RIVERS,
LLP, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Dimitry Pronin appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of
the magistrate judge and denying relief on Pronin’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Pronin v. Cannon, No. 5:19-cv-00594-DCN (D.S.C. Mar. 15,
2021). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.