The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
21-6532•Robert Clifford Weddington v. Us Xpress, Inc.
21-6532Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 5, 2022
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-6532
ROBERT CLIFFORD WEDDINGTON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
US XPRESS, INC.; LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COM; THOMAS
WYATT; CHARLES LANCELOTTA, MD; DAVID W. GAW, MD; SCOTT
MORGAN, Adjuster,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
Theodore D. Chuang, District Judge. (1:21-cv-00484-TDC)
Submitted: December 17, 2021 Decided: January 5, 2022
Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert Clifford Weddington, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Robert Clifford Weddington appeals the district court’s order dismissing his
complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). The district court determined that Weddington’s
complaint was barred by the statute of limitations. We review a district court’s dismissal
for failure to state a claim under § 1915(e)(2) de novo, applying the same standards as those
for reviewing a Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) dismissal. Martin v. Duffy, 858 F.3d 239, 248 (4th
Cir. 2017) (citations omitted). We have reviewed the record and Weddington’s arguments
on appeal and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Weddington v. US Xpress,
Inc., No. 1:21-cv-00484-TDC (D. Md. Mar. 25, 2021). We also deny Weddington’s
motions for summary disposition, for summary judgment, to appoint counsel, for a hearing,
and to join. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.