The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
21-6558•United States of America v. Raymond Idemudia Aigbekaen
21-6558Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 2, 2021
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-6558
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
RAYMOND IDEMUDIA AIGBEKAEN,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
James K. Bredar, Chief District Judge. (1:15-cr-00462-JKB-2)
Submitted: June 29, 2021 Decided: July 2, 2021
Before HARRIS, RICHARDSON, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Raymond Idemudia Aigbekaen, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Raymond Idemudia Aigbekaen appeals the district court’s order denying relief on
his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i) motions for compassionate release. Upon review, we
discern no abuse of discretion in the district court’s determination that, under the pertinent
18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors, compassionate release was not warranted. See
United States v. Kibble, 992 F.3d 326, 329-31 (4th Cir. 2021) (providing standard of review
and outlining steps for evaluating compassionate release motions). Accordingly, we affirm
the district court’s judgment. We deny Aigbekaen’s motions to dismiss part of the
indictment and for resentencing. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.