United States of America v. Laray Keshawn Copeland, a/k/a Ray Ray

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-6595
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
LARAY KESHAWN COPELAND, a/k/a Ray Ray,
Defendant – Appellant.
No. 21-6636
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
LARAY KESHAWN COPELAND, a/k/a Ray Ray,
Defendant – Appellant.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Wilmington. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (7:09-cr-00157-BO-1; 7:19-cr-00081-
BO-1)
Submitted: September 9, 2022 Decided: September 16, 2022

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Before NIEMEYER and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Laray Keshawn Copeland, Appellant Pro Se. David A. Bragdon, Assistant United States
Attorney, Lucy Partain Brown, Assistant United States Attorney, Jennifer P. May-Parker,
Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY,
Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Laray Keshawn Copeland appeals the district court’s orders denying his motions for
compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A). We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders. See United
States v. Copeland, No. 7:09-cr-00157-BO-1 (E.D.N.C. Apr. 9, 2021); United States v.
Copeland, No. 7:19-cr-00081-BO-1 (E.D.N.C. Apr. 9, 2021). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --