The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
21-6609•United States of America v. Bryan Ferrell, a/k/a BJ, a/k/a BJ Homie
21-6609Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 2, 2021
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-6609
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
BRYAN FERRELL, a/k/a BJ, a/k/a BJ Homie,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, Senior District Judge. (1:18-cr-00391-LO-1)
Submitted: November 19, 2021 Decided: December 2, 2021
Before MOTZ, WYNN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Bryan Ferrell, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Bryan Ferrell appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for
compassionate release. We have reviewed the record and conclude that the district court
did not abuse its discretion denying Ferrell’s motion because it adequately considered the
18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors. See United States v. High, 997 F.3d 181, 186 (4th Cir. 2021).
Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.