United States of America v. Rico Mallard Crump, a/k/a David Lee Crump, a/k/a Rico Mallard, a/k/a Fred Crump

21-6617Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 20, 2021

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-6617
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
RICO MALLARD CRUMP, a/k/a David Lee Crump, a/k/a Rico Mallard, a/k/a Fred
Crump,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at
Greensboro. Catherine C. Eagles, District Judge. (1:00-cr-00293-CCE-5)
Submitted: September 14, 2021 Decided: September 20, 2021
Before THACKER and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Rico Mallard Crump, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Rico Mallard Crump appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(2) motion for a sentence reduction. On appeal, we confine our review to the
issues raised in the informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Crump’s informal brief
does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, he has forfeited appellate
review of the court’s order. See Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014)
(“The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is
limited to issues preserved in that brief.”). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s
judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.