The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
21-6857•Filiberto Avalos v. ROBERT HUDGINS, Warden
21-6857Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 22, 2022
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-6857
FILIBERTO AVALOS,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
ROBERT HUDGINS, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at
Martinsburg. Gina M. Groh, Chief District Judge. (3:20-cv-00188-GMG)
Submitted: March 25, 2022 Decided: April 22, 2022
Before AGEE and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Filiberto Avalos, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Filiberto Avalos, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting in
part and rejecting in part the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief
on Avalos’ 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition and a subsequent order denying Avalos’ motion to
reconsider. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm because, as the district court concluded, the Bureau of Prisons properly calculated
his sentence. Avalos v. Hudgins, No. 3:20-cv-00188-GMG (N.D.W. Va. Mar. 29, 2021 &
May 11, 2021). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.