The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
21-6925•United States of America v. Kevin Heiting
21-6925Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 22, 2021
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-6925
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
KEVIN HEITING,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Paula Xinis, District Judge. (8:16-cr-00434-PX-1)
Submitted: November 18, 2021 Decided: November 22, 2021
Before MOTZ, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kevin Heiting, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Ronald Baldwin, OFFICE OF THE UNITED
STATES ATTORNEY, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Kevin Heiting appeals the district court’s order denying his motion seeking
compassionate release pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A). We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. United States v. Heiting, No. 8:16-cr-00434-PX-1 (D. Md. June 2, 2021).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.