United States of America v. Kiwanii Edward Mosley, a/k/a Ghost

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-6989
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
KIWANII EDWARD MOSLEY, a/k/a Ghost,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:11-cr-00058-RAJ-FBS-3)
Submitted: October 29, 2021 Decided: November 12, 2021
Before DIAZ and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Edward A. Fiorella, Jr., FRAIM & FIORELLA, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellant. Raj
Parekh, Acting United States Attorney, Richard D. Cooke, William D. Muhr, Assistant
United States Attorneys, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Kiwanii Edward Mosley appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion
for compassionate release, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i), as amended by the
First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-391, § 603(b)(1), 132 Stat. 5194, 5239. After
reviewing the record, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in
denying Mosley’s motion. See United States v. Kibble, 992 F.3d 326, 329 (4th Cir. 2021),
cert. denied, No. 21-5624, 2021 WL 4733616 (U.S. Oct. 12, 2021) (stating standard of
review). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United
States v. Mosley, No. 2:11-cr-00058-RAJ-FBS-3 (E.D. Va. June 10, 2021). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --