The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
21-7017•Walter W. Wallace, Iv v. United States Department of Justice
21-7017Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 6, 2022
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-7017
WALTER W. WALLACE, IV,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; MICHAEL CARVAJAL;
THOMAS SCARANTINO; DR. TAMARA S. LYN; RICHARD ENGEL;
OFFICER BOWERS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:21-ct-03035-D)
Submitted: March 15, 2022 Decided: April 6, 2022
Before WILKINSON, QUATTLEBAUM, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Walter W. Wallace, IV, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Walter W. Wallace, IV, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his
complaint filed pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b)(1), 2671-
2680, and Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S.
388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm the district court’s order. Wallace v. U.S. Dep’t of Just., No. 5:21-ct-03035-D
(E.D.N.C. June 24, 2021). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.