The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
21-7076•Robert Holland Koon, a/k/a Robert Koon, a/k/a Robert H. Koon v. Michael McCall
21-7076Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 22, 2021
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-7076
ROBERT HOLLAND KOON, a/k/a Robert Koon, a/k/a Robert H. Koon,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MICHAEL MCCALL; CHARLES WILLIAMS; LIEUTENANT ROBYN
TAYLOR; NURSE RICHTER; CHAPLAIN BARBER; OFFICER COLLIER;
ARDISTER BROWN,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence.
David C. Norton, District Judge. (4:19-cv-00406-DCN)
Submitted: November 18, 2021 Decided: November 22, 2021
Before MOTZ, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert Holland Koon, Appellant Pro Se. Elloree Ann Ganes, William Marshall O’Neil,
HOOD LAW FIRM, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Robert Holland Koon appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion to
set aside settlement and granting Defendants’ motion to enforce settlement. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Koon v. McCall, No. 4:19-cv-00406-DCN (D.S.C. Mar. 29,
2021). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.