The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
21-7088•David M. Watson, Ii v. Private First Class Tippett; Private First Class Cerrone
21-7088Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 2, 2021
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-7088
DAVID M. WATSON, II,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
PRIVATE FIRST CLASS TIPPETT; PRIVATE FIRST CLASS CERRONE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Deborah K. Chasanow, Senior District Judge. (8:18-cv-00220-DKC)
Submitted: October 29, 2021 Decided: November 2, 2021
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David M. Watson, II, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
David Watson appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)
motion as untimely and meritless. Watson did not challenge the district court’s timeliness
determination in his informal brief on appeal, so he has waived review of that holding. See
4th Cir. R. 34(b). Moreover, we have reviewed the record and find no reversible error in
the district court’s determination that the motion lacked merit. Accordingly, we affirm.
Watson v. Tippett, No. 8:18-cv-00220-DKC (D. Md. June 24, 2021). We further deny
Watson’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.