The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
21-7105•James Arthur Biggins v. Maryland District Court 2-3 D.c.; Wicomico County Detention Center
21-7105Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 22, 2021
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-7105
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MARYLAND DISTRICT COURT #2-3 D.C.; WICOMICO COUNTY
DETENTION CENTER,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Peter J. Messitte, Senior District Judge. (8:99-cv-00476-PJM)
Submitted: November 18, 2021 Decided: November 22, 2021
Before MOTZ, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James Arthur Biggins, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
James Arthur Biggins appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion to
reopen his closed civil case and Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion for reconsideration. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. See, e.g., Robinson v. Wix Filtration
Corp., LLC, 599 F.3d 403, 407 (4th Cir. 2010) (noting this court reviews orders denying
reconsideration for abuse of discretion). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.