The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
21-7115•Altony Brooks v. Sergeant Sheila Johnston
21-7115Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 22, 2022
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-7115
ALTONY BROOKS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SERGEANT SHEILA JOHNSTON; CAPTAIN KRIS JACUMIN; SERGEANT
FELISA FLUDD; BERKELEY COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
HILL FINKLEA DETENTION CENTER; OFFICER JOHN DOE; NURSE JOHN
DOE; OFFICER GREENE; OFFICER JOHNSON,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort.
Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Senior District Judge. (9:15-cv-02677-JFA)
Submitted: August 29, 2022 Decided: September 22, 2022
Before WYNN and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
-- 1 of 3 --
2
Altony Brooks, Appellant Pro Se. Christopher Thomas Dorsel, SENN LEGAL, LLC,
Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
Altony Brooks appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his state law claims and
entering judgment in accordance with the jury’s verdict in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action
alleging excessive force in violation of the Eighth Amendment. We have reviewed the
record and Brooks’ arguments on appeal and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm the district court’s judgment. Brooks v. Johnston, No. 9:15-cv-02677-JFA (D.S.C.
June 25 & July 6, 2021). We deny Brooks’ motions to appoint counsel, for a transcript at
government expense, for attorney’s fees, for stay of judgment pending appeal, to
disqualify/recuse Senior United States District Judge Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., and for a
psychological evaluation. Finally, we dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.