The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
21-7119•James F. Eason v. Julian Priest
21-7119Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 10, 2022
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-7119
JAMES F. EASON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JULIAN PRIEST; SGT. MCPHERSON; BILLY MCCUMBEE; FRANKLIN
GRAHAM; JEFFREY K. POPE; MONICA BOND; PAULA JONES; J. C.
HUGGINS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:19-ct-03259-BO)
Submitted: September 8, 2022 Decided: September 12, 2022
Before HARRIS and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James F. Eason, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
James F. Eason appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983
complaint for failure to state a claim under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1). We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order.
Eason v. Priest, No. 5:19-ct-03259-BO (E.D.N.C. June 25, 2021). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.