The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
21-7122•Jerry Mikel Holloman v. United States of America
21-7122Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 19, 2022
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-7122
JERRY MIKEL HOLLOMAN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at
Charlotte. Max O. Cogburn, Jr., District Judge. (3:18-cr-00327-MOC-DCK-1)
Submitted: December 30, 2021 Decided: January 19, 2022
Before THACKER and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jerry Mikel Holloman, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Jerry Mikel Holloman appeals the district court's order denying his motion for
compassionate release pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i), as amended by the First
Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-391, § 603(b)(1), 132 Stat. 5194, 5239. Upon review,
we discern no abuse of discretion in the district court's determination that Holloman did
not establish extraordinary and compelling reasons justifying early release. See United
States v. Kibble, 992 F.3d 326, 329 (4th Cir. 2021) (providing standard of review and
outlining steps for evaluating compassionate release motions). Accordingly, we affirm the
district court's order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.