The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
21-7205•United States of America v. James Ernest Gandy, Jr.
21-7205Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 6, 2022
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-7205
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JAMES ERNEST GANDY, JR.,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at
Greensboro. Catherine C. Eagles, District Judge. (1:20-cr-00040-CCE-1)
Submitted: September 1, 2022 Decided: October 6, 2022
Before RICHARDSON and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James Ernest Gandy, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
James Ernest Gandy, Jr., appeals the district court’s orders denying his 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(1)(A) motions for compassionate release and denying his motion for
reconsideration. We review a district court’s denial of a compassionate release motion for
abuse of discretion. United States v. Kibble, 992 F.3d 326, 329 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 142
S. Ct. 383 (2021). We have reviewed the record and conclude that the court did not abuse
its discretion and sufficiently explained the reasons for the denial. Accordingly, although
we grant Gandy’s motions to supplement his informal brief, we affirm the district court’s
orders. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.