The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
21-7222•Reginald L. Wilson v. Brad Perritt
21-7222Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 24, 2022
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-7222
REGINALD L. WILSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BRAD PERRITT; KENNETH E. LASSITER; GEORGE W. BAYSDEN, JR.;
AMANDA EDWARDS; ROSEMARY E. BIANCARDI; JOHN DOE, #1; JOHN
DOE, #2,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:20-ct-03376-BO)
Submitted: November 22, 2022 Decided: November 28, 2022
Before HARRIS and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Reginald L. Wilson, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Reginald L. Wilson appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 action for failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. Wilson v. Perritt, No. 5:20-ct-03376-BO
(E.D.N.C. Aug. 9, 2021). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.