The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
21-7249•Destined C. M. D. George v. C.o. Puckett, sued in individual
21-7249Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 28, 2022
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-7249
DESTINED C. M. D. GEORGE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
C.O. PUCKETT, sued in individual and official capacity; C.O. OH, sued in
individual and official capacity,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at
Roanoke. James P. Jones, Senior District Judge. (7:19-cv-00846-JPJ-PMS)
Submitted: March 24, 2022 Decided: March 28, 2022
Before MOTZ, WYNN, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Destined C. M. D. George, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Destined C. M. D. George appeals the district court’s order accepting the
recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on George’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983
complaint for failure to demonstrate administrative exhaustion. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. George v. Puckett, No. 7:19-cv-00846-JPJ-PMS (W.D. Va. July 22, 2021).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.