The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
21-7299•United States of America v. Victor Bernard Perkins
21-7299Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 7, 2022
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-7299
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Petitioner - Appellee,
v.
VICTOR BERNARD PERKINS,
Respondent - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (5:92-hc-00654-BR)
Submitted: January 27, 2022 Decided: February 7, 2022
Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Victor Bernard Perkins, Appellant Pro Se. Genna Danelle Petre, Special Assistant United
States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Victor Bernard Perkins appeals the district court’s order denying without prejudice
his motion for compassionate release. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.
Perkins, No. 5:92-hc-00654-BR (E.D.N.C. Aug. 27, 2021). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.