The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
21-7343•Darrell L. Goss v. Shontate Morley
21-7343Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 9, 2022
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-7343
DARRELL L. GOSS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
and
SASHA GASKINS,
Plaintiff,
v.
SHONTATE MORLEY; MARY BRUMEUCCHI; CHRISTINE LONG; S.C.
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; BRYAN P. STIRLING,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
PATTY BRITT-POOSER,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Charleston. Bruce H. Hendricks, District Judge. (2:19-cv-02469-BHH)
Submitted: July 29, 2022 Decided: August 9, 2022
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge, and TRAXLER, Senior
Circuit Judge.
-- 1 of 3 --
2
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Darrell L. Goss, Appellant Pro Se. Gordon Wade Cooper, BUYCK LAW FIRM, LLC,
Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
Darrell L. Goss appeals the district court’s order adopting in part and modifying in
part the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting summary judgment to
Defendants in his civil rights action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Goss v. Morley,
No. 2:19-cv-02469-BHH (D.S.C. Sept. 9, 2021). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.