The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
21-7393•United States of America v. James Thomas Hancock
21-7393Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 1, 2022
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-7393
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JAMES THOMAS HANCOCK,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at
Greensboro. Catherine C. Eagles, District Judge. (1:06-cr-00206-CCE-2)
Submitted: February 24, 2022 Decided: March 1, 2022
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James Thomas Hancock, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
James Thomas Hancock appeals the district court’s order denying his renewed
motion for compassionate release pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i), as amended by
the First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-391, § 603(b)(1), 132 Stat. 5194, 5239. Upon
review, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Hancock’s
motion. See United States v. Kibble, 992 F.3d 326, 329-30 (4th Cir.) (providing standard),
cert. denied, 142 S. Ct. 383 (2021). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.