The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
21-7431•Arthur Dale Senty-Haugen v. PAUL ADAMS, Warden, FCI-Hazelton
21-7431Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 28, 2022
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-7431
ARTHUR DALE SENTY-HAUGEN,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
PAUL ADAMS, Warden, FCI-Hazelton,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at
Clarksburg. Thomas S. Kleeh, Chief District Judge. (1:20-cv-00047-TSK)
Submitted: March 24, 2022 Decided: March 28, 2022
Before MOTZ, WYNN, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Arthur Dale Senty-Haugen, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Arthur Dale Senty-Haugen, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order
adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on
Senty-Haugen’s 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition in which he challenged the execution of his
sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Senty-Haugen v. Adams, No. 1:20-cv-
00047-TSK (N.D.W. Va. Sept. 28, 2021). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.