The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
21-7466•Julio Zelaya Sorto v. P.a. John Doe
21-7466Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 9, 2022
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-7466
JULIO ZELAYA SORTO,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
P.A. JOHN DOE; JOHN DOE, Prison Health Services Utilization Reviewer; NC
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY; P.A. PHILLIP W. TOLMAN,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:18-ct-03242-FL)
Submitted: July 26, 2022 Decided: August 9, 2022
Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Julio Zelaya Sorto, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Julio Zelaya Sorto appeals the district court’s orders denying leave to amend his
complaint and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Sorto v. Doe, No. 5:18-ct-03242-FL (E.D.N.C. Sept. 24, 2020; May 5, 2021;
Sept. 22, 2021). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.