The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
21-7562•Robert Graham, Jr. v. State of South Carolina
21-7562Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 17, 2022
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-7562
ROBERT GRAHAM, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; FLORENCE COUNTY COURT SYSTEMS;
ALAN WILSON, South Carolina Attorney General,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Greenville. Timothy M. Cain, District Judge. (6:21-cv-00769-TMC)
Submitted: April 29, 2022 Decided: May 17, 2022
Before WYNN, THACKER, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert Graham, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Robert Graham, Jr., appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation
of the magistrate judge and dismissing Graham’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint under 28
U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B), 1915A. He also appeals the denial of his motion for
reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Graham v. South Carolina, No.
6:21-cv-00769-TMC (D.S.C. Sept. 30 & Nov. 1, 2021). We deny Graham’s motions to
place the case in abeyance, for remand, to appoint counsel, and to amend sentence. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.