The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
21-7634•Derwin Peterson v. COLONEL MELETIS, Superintendent
21-7634Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 25, 2022
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-7634
DERWIN PETERSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
COLONEL MELETIS, Superintendent; SERGEANT OUTLAND, Shift Sgt.;
OFFICER BAKER, Post Officer,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. Rossie David Alston, Jr., District Judge. (1:20-cv-00753-RDA-MSN)
Submitted: January 20, 2022 Decided: January 25, 2022
Before WILKINSON, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Derwin Peterson, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Derwin Peterson appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983
action without prejudice for failure to comply with the court’s order directing him to file a
third amended complaint. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). We review a district court’s dismissal
under Rule 41(b) for abuse of discretion. Attkisson v. Holder, 925 F.3d 606, 625 (4th Cir.
2019). We have reviewed the record and discern no abuse of discretion. Accordingly, we
affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.