The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
21-7683•United States of America v. David Hill
21-7683Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 26, 2022
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-7683
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
DAVID HILL,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:01-cr-00191-CMH-1)
Submitted: May 24, 2022 Decided: May 26, 2022
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David Hill, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
David Hill appeals the district court’s order denying the Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(a) motion
to correct a clerical error that Hill filed in his underlying criminal case. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. United States v. Hill, No. 1:01-cr-00191-CMH-1 (E.D. Va. Nov. 4,
2021). We deny Hill’s motions to place this appeal in abeyance pending the district court’s
resolution of another postjudgment motion; for limited remand to the district court; for
judicial notice of FBI documents; and for reassignment to a different district court judge.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.