The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
21-7713•Khalil J. Kimbrough v. KEVIN HUDSON, Superintendent
21-7713Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 26, 2022
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-7713
KHALIL J. KIMBROUGH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
KEVIN HUDSON, Superintendent; HAROLD CLARKE, Director of DOC;
NURSE MEADE, Director of the Medical Staff; COMMONWEALTH OF
VIRGINIA; STAFFORD, VA; FREDERICKSBURG, VA; SPOTSYVANIA, VA;
KING GEORGE, VA; MANAGER OF SUMMIT FOOD SERVICES; STAFF OF
RAPPAHANNOCK REGIONAL JAIL,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Norfolk. Roderick Charles Young, District Judge. (2:21-cv-00060-RCY-RJK)
Submitted: May 24, 2022 Decided: May 26, 2022
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Khalil J. Kimbrough, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Khalil J. Kimbrough appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 action without prejudice under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for failure to comply with a
court order. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the informal brief.
See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Kimbrough’s informal brief does not challenge the basis
for the district court’s disposition, he has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order.
See Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an
important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved
in that brief.”). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.