The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
21-7715•United States of America v. Mathew Byrd
21-7715Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 20, 2022
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-7715
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
MATHEW BYRD,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at
Huntington. Robert C. Chambers, District Judge. (3:19-cr-00080-1)
Submitted: September 6, 2022 Decided: September 20, 2022
Before MOTZ, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Mathew Ryan Byrd, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Mathew Byrd appeals the district court’s order denying his third motion for
compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A). We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See United
States v. Byrd, No. 3:19-cr-00080-1 (S.D.W. Va. Dec. 1, 2021). We also deny his pending
motion for compassionate release, which should be directed to the sentencing court in the
first instance. See United States v. Raia, 954 F.3d 594, 596 (3d Cir. 2020). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.