The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
21-7720•United States of America v. Travis Lindsey Mehaffey
21-7720Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 15, 2022
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-7720
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
TRAVIS LINDSEY MEHAFFEY,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at
Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger, Chief District Judge. (1:17-cr-00012-MR-WCM-1)
Submitted: October 13, 2022 Decided: October 17, 2022
Before NIEMEYER and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Travis Lindsey Mehaffey, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Travis Lindsey Mehaffey appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for
compassionate release pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A). We have reviewed the
record on appeal and conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying
relief. See United States v. Kibble, 992 F.3d 326, 329 (4th Cir.) (providing standard), cert.
denied, 142 S. Ct. 383 (2021). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. United States v. Mehaffey, No. 1:17-cr-00012-MR-WCM-1 (W.D.N.C.
Oct. 28, 2021). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.