The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
21-7734•United States of America v. Clarence Robert Brown, Jr.
21-7734Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 1, 2022
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-7734
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
CLARENCE ROBERT BROWN, JR.,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at
Charlotte. Max O. Cogburn, Jr., District Judge. (3:17-cr-00263-MOC-DCK-1)
Submitted: March 29, 2022 Decided: April 1, 2022
Before HARRIS, QUATTLEBAUM, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Clarence Robert Brown, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Clarence Robert Brown, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(1)(A) motion for compassionate release. Upon review, we discern no abuse of
discretion in the district court’s denial of Brown’s motion. See United States v. High, 997
F.3d 181, 185 (4th Cir. 2021) (stating standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm the
district court’s order. United States v. Brown, No. 3:17-cr-00263-MOC-DCK-1 (W.D.N.C.
Nov. 29, 2021). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.