The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
21-7755•Denrick Eric Brown v. DAVID A. ROBINSON, Deputy Director
21-7755Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 11, 2022
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-7755
DENRICK ERIC BROWN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DAVID A. ROBINSON, Deputy Director; KAREN STAPLETON, Disciplinary Appeal
Unit Manager; CHRISTOPHER J. GENSINGER, CCB Manager; BRIAN MORAN,
Secretary of Public Safety; G. HOLLOWAY, Regional Administrator; HAROLD W.
CLARKE, Director; A. WHITE, Assistant Warden; G. F. SIVILS, Chief of Operations; T.
TERRY, Chief of Security; T. CHURMURA, Chief of Housing; CHARLES CARPINO,
Unit Manager; T. WATKIN, Security Supervisor; J. BARR, Security Officer; CHARLES
M. TURNER, Institution Investigator; L. WATSON, Disciplinary Hearing Officer; K.
COSBY, Regional Ombudsman; SHARON DUNSON, Grievance Staff; Y. HOLMES,
Institution Grievance Staff,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:20-cv-01282-CMH-TCB)
Submitted: July 25, 2022 Decided: August 11, 2022
Before DIAZ, HARRIS, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
-- 1 of 3 --
2
Denrick Eric Brown, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
Denrick Eric Brown appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Brown v. Robinson,
No. 1:20-cv-01282-CMH-TCB (E.D. Va. Dec. 2, 2021). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.