The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
21-7762•Kevin Elwood Bullock v. A. MENDOZA, Acting Warden; FCI WILLIAMSBURG
21-7762Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 15, 2022
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-7762
KEVIN ELWOOD BULLOCK,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
A. MENDOZA, Acting Warden; FCI WILLIAMSBURG,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock
Hill. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Senior District Judge. (0:21-cv-03205-JFA)
Submitted: September 27, 2022 Decided: October 17, 2022
Before NIEMEYER and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges, and MOTZ, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kevin Elwood Bullock, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Kevin Elwood Bullock, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order and
judgment accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on
Bullock’s 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition in which Bullock challenged his revocation sentence.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm.
Bullock v. Mendoza, No. 0:21-cv-03205-JFA (D.S.C. Dec. 9, 2021). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.