Andrew Chien v. Edward Anson Robbins, Jr.; Frederick G. Rockwell, Iii; Wendy S. Hughes; Karl S. Leonard

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-1004
ANDREW CHIEN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
EDWARD ANSON ROBBINS, JR.; FREDERICK G. ROCKWELL, III; WENDY
S. HUGHES; KARL S. LEONARD,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Richmond. John A. Gibney, Jr., Senior District Judge. (3:21-cv-00501-JAG)
Submitted: May 24, 2022 Decided: May 27, 2022
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Andrew Chien, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Hensley, OFFICE OF THE
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia; John P. O’Herron,
THOMPSON MCMULLAN PC, Richmond, Virginia; Justin Lee Criner, William Fisher
Etherington, BEALE LAW FIRM, PC, North Chesterfield, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Andrew Chien appeals the district court’s orders granting Defendants’ motions to
dismiss Chien’s civil action on multiple grounds and imposing a prefiling injunction
against Chien. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Chien v. Robbins, No. 3:21-cv-00501-
JAG (E.D. Va. Nov. 30, 2021 & Dec. 3, 2021). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --