The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
22-1065•Anthony Zappin v. Rachael L. Fletcher Cipoletti
22-1065Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 23, 2022
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-1065
ANTHONY ZAPPIN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
RACHAEL L. FLETCHER CIPOLETTI; JUSTICE EVAN JENKINS; JUSTICE
BETH WALKER; JUSTICE BILL WOOTEN; JUSTICE TIM ARMSTEAD;
JUSTICE JOHN HUTCHINSON; EDYTHE GAISER; ANNE LAMBRIGHT;
GAIL HENDERSON STAPLES,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at
Charleston. Irene C. Berger, District Judge. (2:21-cv-00119)
Submitted: July 21, 2022 Decided: July 25, 2022
Before MOTZ, HARRIS, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Anthony Zappin, Appellant Pro Se. Ancil Glenn Ramey, STEPTOE & JOHNSON PLLC,
Huntington, West Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Anthony Zappin appeals the district court’s orders granting Defendants’ motion to
dismiss Zappin’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action and denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the
district court’s orders. Zappin v. Cipoletti, No. 2:21-cv-00119 (S.D.W. Va. Sept. 24, 2021;
Dec. 17, 2021). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.