The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
22-1077•Warrenton S. London, Sr.; Carlene C. London v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service
22-1077Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 28, 2022
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-1077
WARRENTON S. LONDON, SR.; CARLENE C. LONDON,
Petitioners - Appellants,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States Tax Court. (Tax Ct. No. 2624-19)
Submitted: July 26, 2022 Decided: July 28, 2022
Before MOTZ, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Warrenton S. London, Sr., Carlene C. London, Appellants Pro Se. Pooja Ashok Boisture,
Bruce R. Ellisen, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C.,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Warrenton S. London, Sr., and Carlene C. London appeal the tax court’s order
upholding the Commissioner’s determination of a deficiency and an addition to tax with
respect to their 2015 federal income tax liability. We have reviewed the record and the tax
court’s decision and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the tax court. London v. Comm’r of Internal Revenue, No. 2624-19 (Tax Ct. Mar. 17,
2021). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.